How We Cleared a 100+ Item Product Backlog in 8 Weeks

How clearing a 100+ item product backlog in 8 weeks taught me that backlog health is a leadership problem, not a process problem.

PRODUCT MANAGEMENTPRODUCT LEADERSHIPAGILE & SCRUM

Nagaraj Basarkod

9/30/20252 min read

When I joined the product team, our backlog had grown to over 100 items. Sprint planning took hours. Priorities were unclear. The team was drowning in tickets, and velocity was suffering.

Eight weeks later, we had cut the backlog by 90%, reduced planning time by half, and accelerated feature delivery by 30%.

Here's what we did—and what I learned about backlog health as a product leadership problem, not just a process issue.

The Real Problem Wasn't the Backlog

Large backlogs aren't just administrative overhead. They're symptoms of deeper issues:

Unclear prioritization frameworks. When everything seems important, nothing is. Our team was creating tickets for anticipated future work, internal communications, and every possible edge case. Without clear criteria for what deserved backlog space, the list kept growing.

Porous sprint boundaries. Tickets moved in and out of sprints constantly. Stakeholders added items mid-sprint. Descoped work rolled into the backlog without review. We had no mechanism to say "no" or "not now."

Low-priority traps. Some tickets sat for months, discussed in every planning session but never prioritized. They consumed time and attention without ever getting resolved.

The backlog wasn't just messy; it was slowing us down and obscuring what actually mattered.

What We Changed

These weren't minor adjustments—they were fundamental shifts in how we approached product decisions. Each change required buy-in from engineering, stakeholders, and leadership. Some were uncomfortable, but all were necessary.

Defined clear impact-based prioritization
We stopped using vague priority labels and started asking: What's the user impact? What's the business value? What's the technical risk?

A "low priority" UI glitch that confused users became high priority. A "high priority" feature request with unclear value got shelved. Impact became our north star.

Aligned everything to the roadmap
If a ticket didn't support our quarterly objectives, it didn't belong in the backlog. This was hard, we closed tickets that seemed "useful" but weren't essential. We stopped using the backlog as a catch-all for every idea.

Purged dormant items
Any ticket untouched for four sprints got closed or archived. If something hadn't been worth addressing in two months, it wasn't critical. This alone cut 40% of the backlog.

Applied the 70/30 rule
Each sprint: 70% new roadmap work, 30% backlog cleanup. This kept us making progress while systematically addressing technical debt and old issues. Velocity took a small hit initially, but quality and morale improved significantly.

The Results

Within eight weeks:

  • Backlog dropped from 100+ items to under 10

  • Sprint planning time cut in half

  • Feature delivery accelerated 30%

  • Team clarity and morale improved measurably

But the bigger win was cultural. The team stopped seeing the backlog as an endless to-do list and started seeing it as a strategic tool a curated set of next-up work, not a graveyard of abandoned ideas

What I Learned

Backlog health is a leadership responsibility, not a process problem. You can't optimize your way to clarity. Someone has to make hard choices about what matters and what doesn't.

Saying "no" is as important as saying "yes." A bloated backlog signals a team that hasn't learned to decline work. Closing tickets isn't admitting defeat—it's making room for what matters.

Your backlog reflects your strategy. If you can't explain why every item is there, you probably don't have clear enough product priorities.

What Product Leadership Actually Means

Managing a backlog isn't about perfect systems or ticket hygiene. Product leadership means making decisive calls when there's no perfect answer, protecting your team's focus when everyone wants something different, and taking ownership of outcomes even when decisions are unpopular.

It's not about managing tickets. It's about owning direction, driving clarity, and ensuring your team spends their energy on work that matters. That's leadership making the hard calls, communicating them clearly, and taking responsibility for the results.

A healthy backlog is a byproduct of strong product leadership. When leaders create clarity, teams deliver results.